Get 10% Off with
"10OFF" discount coupon code now.

Get personalized service: We guarantee that our papers are PLAGIARISM-FREE

Avoid the Hustle

Wanda v. Center High School Argument brief (arguing for Center High)

I will attach the case background (file name moot_supreme_court_cases) and paper requirements(file name moot_sc_activity_requirements). You are only doing the attorney paper, not the judge paper because that is on a separate case. And for the case background just scroll down until you find the wanda vs center high sheet. Some topics my teacher suggested were focusing on the freedom of religious and speech violations, that Center High used the least restrictive means, that this isn't a content based ban, because all gang symbols were banned. There was nothing against the pentagram, but just gang symbols in general. It was content neutral. Also talk about the free exercise test and lemon test if possible. The school has a obligation to protect the girl. But in a public setting she can take on that danger.Also somewhere cite a case or two as support for argument. Suggestion is Bivens vs Albuquerque.

Wanda v. Center High School Argument brief (arguing for Center High)

I will attach the case background (file name moot_supreme_court_cases) and paper requirements(file name moot_sc_activity_requirements). You are only doing the attorney paper, not the judge paper because that is on a separate case. And for the case background just scroll down until you find the wanda vs center high sheet. Some topics my teacher suggested were focusing on the freedom of religious and speech violations, that Center High used the least restrictive means, that this isn't a content based ban, because all gang symbols were banned. There was nothing against the pentagram, but just gang symbols in general. It was content neutral. Also talk about the free exercise test and lemon test if possible. The school has a obligation to protect the girl. But in a public setting she can take on that danger.Also somewhere cite a case or two as support for argument. Suggestion is Bivens vs Albuquerque.