1). Prepare a 2-3 page briefing from the case Miranda v. Arizona (1966) located at http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgibin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=384&invol=436. Utilize the following areas of importance:
b). short answer
c). the facts the case
d).a summary of the case
e). a conclusion of the outcome.
2). Examine the importance of the 4th, 5th, and 6th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, and determine which amendment offers the greatest protection for defendants in a typical U.S. court case. Justify the position.
3). Explore the overall importance of the 5th Amendment rights. Suggest key events from the Miranda v. Arizona case in which you believe law enforcement had violated the fundamental nature of ones 5th Amendment right. Justify the response.
4). Examine 3 instances in which the 4th Amendment protects you against unlawful search and seizure. Provide examples of such occurrences to support the response.
5). Discuss the 2 prong test articulated by the court which determines the actual nature of a reasonable expectation of privacy. Justify the validity of the test in the courts holding for the Katz v. United States case.
6). Analyze whether or not today’s standards allowing government access to all electronic technologies through legislation, like the Uniting and Strengthening America By Providing Appropriate Tools Required To Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (U.S.A. P.A.T.R.I.O.T) Act of 2001, have effectively negated the holding in Katz v. United States